Nilai Ekonomi Sadranan Perspektif Masyarakat Bukan Pengguna Melestarikan Budaya Sadranan

Sri Walyoto

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the value of the Cepogo sadranan cultural tradition from the perspective communities to form Non Use Value . Non Use Value is value a combination of opsyen values, existence, heritance that forms Passive value. The research was conducted on the community not users in Central Java. The Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) was used in this study. Multiple linear models are used to find out the variables studied are and explained by independent variables (distance, income, age). The results of the study of the independent variables significantly can explain the variables studied the willingness of the community not the user to pay (WTP) to preserve the cultural tradition of Cepogo sadranan. An organization that manages sadranan culture preservation funds is needed so that the understanding of future generations can still preserve the sadranan cultural tradition as a vehicle for unifying community friendship.

Keywords

Sadranan Culture Preservation, CVM, WTP

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abeysekera, I. 2007. Intellectual capital reporting between a developing and developed nation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8 (2): 329-345

Agus Maladi Irianto, 2017. Kesenian Tradisional Sebagai Sarana Strategi Kebudayaan di Tengah Determinasi. Jurnal NUSA. Vol 12. Nomer.1.

Arivia Gadis dan Abby Gina, 2015. Culture, Sex and Religion: a Study of Contract-Marriage in Cisarua and Jakarta. Jurnal Perempuan Vol.20.No.1. 57-64.

Black Steward J. And Lyman W Poster. 2000. Management: Meeting New Challenges. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.

Debby Willar, Jerry Lintong, dan Revleen Kaparang, 2015. Identifikasi Profil Budaya Organisasi Yang Memdukung Implementasi Mutu Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan. Edisi Juni XXXIV. No.2.ISSN 0216-1370.

Hit, Michael A., R.. Duane Ireland dan Robet Hoskinson. 2001. Managewment Strategis: Daya Saing dan Globalisasi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Hanley, N.D. 1989. Valuing Rural Recreation Benefits: An Aprical Empirical Comparation of Two Approaches. Journal of Agricultural Economic.40: 361-374.

Kayam, Umar. 1996. Kebudayaan dan Budaya Perusahaan. Manajemen Usahawan Indonesia 07/XXV.

Ladiyanto, Erlangga Agustino and Wardaya, Wirya. 2009. Framework of Regional Development in Agenda 21: Sustainability and Environmental Vision. Airlangga University dalam http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/2381/_

Rapi Gopal. 2005. Indigenous Environmental Knwoledge in Formal Education. Journal Penyelidikan. MPBL.6

Soo-Hoon Lee., Poh Kam Wong and Chee Leong Chong. 2005. Human and Sosial Capital Explanation for R&D Outcomes IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 52 (1) p 59-68.

Susanto, A.B., Sujanto FX., Wijanarko Himawan. 2008. Corporate Culture Organization Culture. The Jakarta Culsulting Group.

Sri Walyoto, 2011. Analisis Ekonomi Impak Alam Sekitar dan Budaya. Thesis. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

_______, 2018. Economic Analysis of Enviromental and Cultural Impacts of the Development of Palm Oil Plantation. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy.

______, 2018. Carbon Costs of Indonesia Forested Land Conversion to Oil Palm Plantations. Shirkah. Journal of Economics and Business, Vol 3 No.3.

______, 2019. Nilai Ekonomi Umbul Pengging Sebagai Area Tujuan Wisata. Jurnal Inferensi IAIN Salatiga.http://inferensi.iainsalatiga.ac.id/index.php/inferensi/article/view/1040

Sardiman,AM, 1992. Konsep Kekuasan Dalam Tradisi Budaya Jawa. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan. Nomer I Tahun XI, Februari 1992.

Taylor, Edward.1920. [1871]. Primitive Culture. New York: J.P. Putnam’s Sons.410. Throsby, David, 1999.Cultural Capital. Journal of Cultural Economics, 23 (1-2): 3-12.

Throsby, David. 1997. Sustainability and Culture: Some Theoritical Inssues. The International Journal of Culture Policy. JCPOEW 4 (1) 1-242.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.