DETERMINANT ANALYSIS OF THE NET BENEFITS OF THE USE OF SAKTI: USER SATISFACTION MEDIATION

Authors

  • Azwar Iskandar Master Program in Public Administration, Open University, Makassar, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Tenry Nur Amriani Financial Education and Training Agency of Makassar, Ministry of Finance of Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29040/ijebar.v5i2.2418

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of system quality, information quality, and service quality of the system on net benefits of SAKTI implementation mediated by user satisfaction. The study uses primary data obtained from 112 respondents at the working units in the BPPK through questionnaires using the purposive sampling technique. This study uses path analysis technique. The type of research is causal explanatory using inferential statistical analysis technique in the form of path analysis. The results showed that the quality of the system, the quality of information and service quality from the implementation of the SAKTI proved empirically not able to provide user satisfaction and optimal net benefits. The quality of the system affects the user satisfaction and user satisfaction also affects the net benefits. However, the quality of information and service quality does not affect the satisfaction of SAKTI users in an integrated way. User satisfaction cannot be a intervening variable between service quality and the net benefit obtained. DJPB is expected to improve the quality of information and services thoroughly and continuously so that the user satisfaction and the benefits of SAKTI can be obtained optimally.

References

Almutairi, H. (2001). Evaluating information system success in public organizations: A theoretical model and empirical validation. Disertasi Doktor, The Pennsylvania State University. Diakses dari: http://eresources.perpusnas.go.id.

Amriani, T. N., & Iskandar, A. (2019). Analisis Kesuksesan Implementasi Sistem Aplikasi Keuangan Tingkat Instansi (SAKTI) pada Satuan Kerja di Lingkungan Badan Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Keuangan (BPPK). Kajian Ekonomi dan Keuangan, 3(1), 54-74.

Bailey, J. E., & Pearson, S. W. (1983). Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Science, 29(5), 530-545.

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information systems research, 3(1), 60-95.

Delone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of management information systems, 19(4), p. 9-30.

Ghozali, I. (2006). Structural Equation Modelling Metode Alternatif Dengan Partial Least Square, edisi 2. Semarang: BP-UNDIP.

Goodhue, D. L. & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2),213-236.

Hartono, J. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis: Salah Kaprah dan Pengalaman-pengalaman. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Iskandar, A., & Amriani, T. (2015). Pengujian Empiris Model Delone dan Mclean Pada Sistem Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Secara Elektronik (Studi Kementerian Keuangan). Kajian Akademis BPPK Tahun 2015.

Iskandar, A., Amriani, T.N., & Subekan, A. (2016). Evaluasi Atas Implementasi Aplikasi Sistem Akuntansi Instansi Basis Akrual (SAIBA) Dengan Pendekatan Delone & McLean Information System Success Model (Studi Kasus Mitra Kerja KPPN Gorontalo dan Marisa) (Evaluation on Implementation of Accrual Basic Application System (SAIBA) Using Delone & McLean Information System Success Model (Case Study of Stakeholders of KPPN Gorontalo and Marisa). Jurnal Tata Kelola & Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara, Volume 2, Nomor 2, Desember 2016. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2892920.

Ives,B., Olson, M., & Baroudi, S. (1983). The Measurement of User Information Satisfaction. Communcations of the ACM, October 1983.

Laudon, K. C., Laudon, J. P. (2000). Management Information System in Six Edition : Organization and Technology in The Networked Enterprise. International Edition. www. prenhall.com/laudon.

Livari, J. (2005). An empirical test of the DeLone-McLean model of information system success. ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 36(2), 8-27.

Mardiana, S., Tjakraatmadjaa, J.H., dan Aprianingsih, A. (2015). Validating the Conceptual Model for Predicting Intention to Use as Part of Information System Success Model: The Case of an Indonesian Government Agency. Procedia Computer Science, Volume 72, 2015, p.353-360.

Nasrudin, E. (2017). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Memepengaruhi Sikap Penerimaan, Penggunaan dan Kepuasan Pengguna Sistem Aplikasi Akuntansi Keuangan Tingkat Instansi (SAKTI). Tesis : Program Studi Magister Akuntansi Universitas Sebelas Maret (UNS) Surabaya.

Noviyanti. (2016). Mengukur kesuksesan Sistem Akuntansi Instansi Basis Akrual (SAIBA) menggunakan model DeLone & Mclean. Jurnal Tata Kelola & Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara, 2(2), 151-173.

Pambudi, K. H. (2018). Analisis Dimensi Kesuksesan Implementasi Sistem Aplikasi Keuangan Tingkat Instansi (Sakti) Pada Satuan Kerja Wilayah Provinsi Jawa Timur Dengan Pendekatan Delone And McLean Information System Success Model. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB, 6(2).

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). Servqual: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perc. Journal of retailing, 64(1), 12.

Peter, S., Delone, W.H., & McLean, E.R. (2008). Measuring Information System success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationship. European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 236-263.

Prihadi, U.Y. (2007). Eksplorasi Data dan Analisis Regresi dengan SPSS. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Pess.

Radityo, D. (2007). Pengujian Model DeLone and McLean Dalam Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Manajemen (Kajian Sebuah Kasus).

Rai, A., Lang, S. S. & Welker, R. B. (2002). Assessing the validity of IS success models: An empirical test and theoretical analysis. Information Systems Research, 13(1), 50–69.

Seddon P. B., & Kiew M. Y. (1996). A partial test and development of DeLone and McLean’s model of IS success. Australian Journal of Information Systems, 4(1), 90–109.

Seddon, P., & Yip, S. K. (1992). An empirical evaluation of user information satisfaction (UIS) measures for use with general ledger accounting software. Journal of Information Systems, 6(1), 75-92.

Segars, A. H., & Grover, V. (1993). Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis. MIS quarterly, 517-525.

Sekaran, U. 2006. Research Methods for Business. 4th Ed. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Somad, Rismi. (2013). Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi dan Komitmen Organisasional Terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Pegawai Hotel Berbintang Empat di Kota Bandung (Survei Terhadap Pegawai Customer Services). Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen, Vol. 9 No. 3, Mei 2013, (320-422).

Wixom, B.H. & Todd, P.A. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology. Information Systems Research, 16(1):85-102

Downloads

Published

2021-06-26

How to Cite

Iskandar, A., & Amriani, T. N. (2021). DETERMINANT ANALYSIS OF THE NET BENEFITS OF THE USE OF SAKTI: USER SATISFACTION MEDIATION. International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 5(2). https://doi.org/10.29040/ijebar.v5i2.2418

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021): IJEBAR, VOL. 05 ISSUE 02, JUNE 2021

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with IJEBAR agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the IJEBAR right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in IJEBAR. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in IJEBAR. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).