THE EXISTENCE OF REQUEST CIVIL OF REGIONAL OFFICERS WHOSE SCOPE OF DECISONS ARE APPLICABLE IN THE REGIONAL AREA

Authors

  • Siti Latifah Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
  • Rr. Herini Siti Aisyah Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
  • Xavier Nugraha Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29040/ijebar.v5i3.3289

Abstract

From Article 45A paragraph (1) jo. Paragraph (2) of Law 5/2004, it can be understood that a state administrative case whose object of lawsuit is a decision of a regional official whose decision range is valid in the region concerned cannot be filed for cassation, but things that are not regulated are related about request civil. Based on the background above, it can be understood that the formulation of the problem in this article are: 1) Limitation of legal remedies against state administrative cases where the object of the lawsuit is a regional official's decision whose range of decisions applies to regional areas; and 2) Legal remedies to review state administrative cases where the object of the lawsuit is a decision by a regional official whose decision range is valid in a regional area. This research is legal research with statute approach and conceptual approach. Based on this research, it was found that Firstly The limitation of legal remedies against state administrative cases where the object of the lawsuit is in the form of a regional office's decision whose range of decisions applies to regional areas is that an appeal cannot be filed and Secondly there is no prohibition at all regarding legal remedies for request civil

References

Abrianto, B. O., Nugraha, X., & Grady, N. (2018). Perkembangan Gugatan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum oleh Pemerintah Pasca-Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 48(4), 43–62.

Basri, H. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Berdasarkan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 2(2), 104–121. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v2i2.90

Effendi, J., & Ibrahim, J. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris (Cetakan ke). Kencana.

Firman, Zaini, Z. D., & Ramasari, R. D. (2020). Analisis Perlawanan Pihak Ketiga ( Derden Verzet) Terhadap Eksekusi Di Pengadilan Negeri ( Studi Putusan Nomor : 134/PDT.BTH/2019/ PN. TJK). PALAR (Pakuan Law Review), 07(1), 1–12.

Haloman, P. (2015). Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Upaya-Upaya Hukum. Yurisprudentia, 1(1), 42–53.

Heriyanto, B. (2018). Kompetensi Absolut Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Berdasarkan Paradigma Uu No. 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Palar | Pakuan Law Review, 4(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.33751/.v4i1.784

Hiariej, E. O. S. (2015). Prinsip- Prinsip Hukum Pidana Edisi Revisi. Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

Hidayatullah, H., & Burhanuddin, H. (2020). Judex Facti Mahkamah Syar’iyah Provinsi Aceh Dalam Menangani Perkara Cerai Talak (Analisis Putusan Nomor 45/Pdt.G/2017/MS.Aceh). Al-Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Peradilan Islam, 1(1), 63–64.

Hutchinson, T. (2008). Developing Legal Research Skills : Expanding The Paradigm. Melbourne University Law Review, 32(1), 1068.

Indonesia, T. P. L. T. M. A. R. (2020). Laporan Tahunan 2020 Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Optimalisasi Peradilan Modern Berkelanjutan. https://www.mahkamahagung.go.id/cms/media/8832

Informasi, P. D. L., Administrasi, B. H. D. H. B. U., & Indonesia, M. A. R. (2010). Himpunan Hasil Rapat Kerja Nasional Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Dengan Jajaran Pengadilan Pada 4 (Empat) Lingkungan Peradilan Di Seluruh Indonesia Tahun 2007 Dan Tahun 2008.

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum : Edisi Revisi. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Mertokusumo, S. (2009). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Liberty.

Mertokusumo, S. (2010). Hukum Acara Perdata. Universitas. Universitas Atmajaya.

Muhibuddin, Syahbandir, M., & Rasyid, M. N. (2017). Tinjauan Yuridis Pembatasan Upaya Hukum Kasasi Dalamkasus Gugatan Terhadap Keputusan Pejabat Daerah. Syiah Kuala Law Journal, 1(2), 67–82.

Muhlizi, A. F. (2015). Peninjauan Kembali Dalam Perkara Pidana Yang Berkeadilan Dan Berkepastian Hukum. Jurnal Yudisial, 8 N0,2, 145–166.

Nugraha, X., & Wicaksana, P. (2021). Keadilan Proporsional Sebagai Landasan Filosofis Pengaturan Perizinan Pendirian Tempat Ibadah di Indonesia. Jatiswara, 36(2), 182–197.

Nur Iftitah Isnantiana. (2017). Legal Reasoning Hakim dalam Pengambilan Putusan Perkara di Pengadilan. Islamadina, 18(2), 53.

Purnomo, W., Aisyah, R. H. S., Mulahela, T., & Nugraha, X. (2020). Analysis of Lawsuit Against the Factual Action which Conducted by Military after Law Number 30 Year 2014 Concerning Government Administration. Unram Law Review. https://doi.org/10.29303/ulrev.v4i1.107

Putrijanti, A., & Leonard, L. T. (2019). Kompetensi Peratun Untuk Memeriksa Unsur Penyalahgunaan Wewenang. Jurnal Ius Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 7(1), 108–127.

Rato, D. (2021). Dasar-dasar Ilmu Hukum Memahami Hukum Sejak Dini. Prenada Media.

Setiawan, P. J., Nugraha, X., & Taufiqurrohman, M. M. (2020). Penggunaan Daluwarsa sebagai Dasar Gugatan Praperadilan di Indonesia: Antara Formil atau Materiil. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 3(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v3i2.4125

Setyono, Y. A. (2019). Tinjauan “Novum†Dalam Peninjauan Kembali Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 49(1), 136–152.

Siku, S. (2016). Perlindungan Hak Asasi Saksi Dan Korban Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana. Indonesia Prime.

Simanjuntak, E. (2018). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara: Transformasi & Refleksi. Sinar Grafika.

Sitorus, S. (2018). Upaya Hukum Dalam Perkara Perdata ( Verzet , Banding, Kasasi, Peninjauan Kembali dan Derden Verzet ). Jurnal Hikmah, 15(64), 63–71.

Sofyan, A. (2013). Hukum Acara Pidana Suatu Pengantar. Rangkang Education.

Sugiarto, E., & Tirtamulia, T. (2012). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Brilian Internasional.

Suhariyanto, B. (2016). Progresivitas Putusan Pemidanaan Terhadap Korporasi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Progressivity of Criminal Decision on Corporate Actors Corruption). Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 16(2), 201. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2016.v16.201-213

Triwulan.T, T. (2016). Hukum Tata Usaha Negara Dan Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Indonesia (Edisi Pert). Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Viswandro. (2014). Kamus Istilah Hukum: Sumber Rujukan Peristilahan Hukum. Medpress Digital.

Wantu, F. M. (2014). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. UNG Press.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-29

How to Cite

Latifah, S., Aisyah, R. H. S., & Nugraha, X. (2021). THE EXISTENCE OF REQUEST CIVIL OF REGIONAL OFFICERS WHOSE SCOPE OF DECISONS ARE APPLICABLE IN THE REGIONAL AREA. International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 5(3), 2330–2345. https://doi.org/10.29040/ijebar.v5i3.3289

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 3 (2021): IJEBAR : Vol. 05, Issue 03, September 2021

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with IJEBAR agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the IJEBAR right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in IJEBAR. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in IJEBAR. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).