PENGARUH KOMITMEN ORGANISASI DAN TINGKAT KECURANGAN TERHADAP INTENSI MELAKUKAN WHISTLE BLOWING DENGAN SIFAT MACHIAVELLIAN SEBAGAI PEMODERASI

Penulis

  • Yunita Kurnia Shanti Universitas Pamulang, Indonesia

Abstrak

This study aims to examine the effect of organizational commitment and the level of fraud on the intention to do wishtle blowing with Machiavellian nature as a moderator at PT Jaya Konstruksi Manggala Pratama, Tbk. The population in this study were all permanent employees who worked at PT Jaya Konstruksi Manggala Pratama, Tbk as many as 45 people. The sampling method using a saturated sample, namely the use of the entire population without having to draw a research sample as the unit of observation, is referred to as the saturated or census technique. The number of questionnaires as many as 45 were distributed and obtained a sample of 32 respondents who returned and could be tested. Methods of data analysis using multiple linear regression and MRA. The results of this study indicate that organizational commitment has a significant effect on the intention to do whistle blowing. The two levels of fraud have no effect on the intention to do whistle blowing. The three organizational commitments and the level of fraud simultaneously affect the intention to do whistle blowing. The four Machiavellian traits are not able to moderate the effect of organizational commitment on the intention to do whistle blowing. The five Machiavellian traits are not able to moderate the influence of the level of fraud on the intention to do whistle blowing. The six Machiavellian traits are able to moderate the effect of organizational commitment and the level of fraud simultaneously on the intention to do whistle blowing. This shows that the large or small value and form of existing fraud still needs to be reported as an action that can harm the company in the short and long term, regardless of whether the individual expects a reward in the form of money or the like but rather on loyalty and commitment to the organization.

Referensi

Agustin, C. R. (2016). Analisis Pengaruh Komitmen Profesional, Komitmen Organisasi, Dan Demografi Terhadap Intensi Melakukan Tindakan Whistle-Blowing. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta.

Ahmad, S. A. (2012). Internal Whistle-Blowing Intentions: Influence of Internal Auditors’ Demographic and Individual Factors. Johor, Universiti Teknologi Mara.

Ajzen, I. (1985). From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behaviour. University of Massachussets, Amherst.

Aliyah, S. (2015). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Minat Pegawai Dalam Melakukan Tindakan Whistle-Blowing. Universitas Islam Nahdlatul Ulama, Jepara.

Annisa, H. (2016). Pengaruh Profesionalisme, Faktor Organisasional, Dan Faktor Situasional Terhadap Intensi Internal Auditor Melakukan Whistle-Blowingâ€, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta.

Association of Certified Fraud Examiner (ACFE). (2000). ACFE Reports The Nation 2000.

Dalton & Radtke. (2012). The Joint Effects of Machiavellianism and Ethical Environment on Whistle-Blowing.

Dekar, dkk.. (2018). Whistle-blowing Intention: The Effects of Moral Intensity, Organizational Commitment, and Professional Commitment.

Ghazali, I. (2013). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSSâ€, Dalam Edisi 7, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.

Hasma. (2017). Determinan Intensi Auditor Melakukan Tindakan Whistle-Blowing Dengan Perlindungan Hukum Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan.

Husniati, S. (2017). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Intensi Untuk Melakukan Whistle-Blowing Internal. Jom Fekon, Volume 4 Nomor 1.

Karyono. (2013). Forensic Fraud. Andi, Yogyakarta.

Kreshastuti, D. K. (2014). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Intensi Auditor Untuk Melakukan Tindakan Whistleblowing. Diponegoro Journal Of Accounting Volume 3 Nomor 2, Universitas Diponegoro.

Merdikawati, R. (2012). Hubungan Komitmen Profesi Dan Sosialisasi Antisipatif Mahasiswa Akuntansi Dengan Niat Whistleblowingâ€, Diponegoro Journal Of Accounting Volume 1, Universitas Diponegoro.

Miceli, M., Near, & Janet. (1985). Characteristics of Organizational Climate and Perceived Wrongdoing Associated with Whistle-Blowing Decisions. Personnel Psychology 38.

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2000). Nomor 70 Tentang Tata Cara Pelaksanaan Peran Serta Masyarakat Dan Pemberian Penghargaan Dalam Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Priantara, D. (2013). Fraud Auditing and Investigation. Mitra Wacana Media, Jakarta.

Rodiyah, S. (2015). Pengaruh Sifat Machiavellian, Lingkungan Etika dan Personal Cost Terhadap Intensi Melakukan Whistle-Blowing. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta.

Semendawai, H., dkk. (2011). Memahami Whistle-Blower. Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban.

Sugiyono. (2004). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta, Bandung.

Suzilla. (2018). Pengaruh Sifat Machiavellian dan Lingkungan Etika Terhadap Niat Melakukan Whistle-Blowing. Universitas Negeri Padang.

Tuanakotta, T. M. (2013). Mendeteksi Manipulasi Laporan Keuangan. Salemba Empat, Jakarta.

Yvonne, A. & Robert, K. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis dan Akuntansi. Dian Rakyat, Jakarta.

Zhuang, J. (2003). Whistle-Blowing and Peer Reporting: A Cross Cultural Comparison of Canadians and Chinese, Tesis Magister Sains University of Lethbridge, Canada.

Diterbitkan

2022-07-17

Cara Mengutip

Shanti, Y. K. (2022). PENGARUH KOMITMEN ORGANISASI DAN TINGKAT KECURANGAN TERHADAP INTENSI MELAKUKAN WHISTLE BLOWING DENGAN SIFAT MACHIAVELLIAN SEBAGAI PEMODERASI. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Pajak, 23(1), 545–549. Diambil dari https://jurnal.stie-aas.ac.id/index.php/jap/article/view/5692

Citation Check