Deteksi Fraud Financial Statement Menggunakan Model Fraud Pentagon Pada Perusahaan Yang Terdaftar di JII Tahun 2016-2018

Authors

  • Ahmad Naufal Fadhlurrahman Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v7i2.2566

Keywords:

Pentagon Fraud, Financial Statement Fraud, Stability, Competence

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the proxies that are considered to be able to detect financial statement fraud with the pentagon fraud model. This model is a development of the fraud triangle and fraud diamond models by adding arrogance elements to complement the previous four existing elements, namely pressure, opportunity, rationalization, and competence. The population used in the study are companies listed on the 2016-2018 Jakarta Islamic Index (JII). Company samples obtained using purposive sampling technique are 14 companies and tested using multiple regression analysis. The results obtained from this study indicate that the stability proxied by changes in total assets and changes in directors as a proxy of the competency element has an influence in predicting financial statement fraud, while the opportunity, rationalization and arrogance elements do not affect financial report fraud. It is hoped that this research can be developed by extending the research years and proxies that represent each element of this model.

References

Apriliana, S., & Agustina, L. (2017). The Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Reportingg Determinant through Fraud Pentagon Approach. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi (JDA), 154–165.

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2016). Report to the nation on occupational fraud and abuse (2016 global fraud study). Diambil dari www.acfe.com/rttn/rttn-2016.pdf.

Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s Money: A study of the social psychology of embezzlement. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

Horwarth, C. (2012). The Mind Behind The Fraudsters Crime :Key Behavioral and Environmental Element. Diambil dari https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjqwenx5cXlAhVTg-YKHYicAn0QFjAAegQIARAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fraudconference.com%2FuploadedFiles%2FFraud_Conference%2FContent%2FCourse-Materials%2Fpresentations%2F23rd%2Fppt%2F10C-Jonathan-Marks.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0vPLBmOme52j5YytUUY9iJ

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial Behavior Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3 No.4.

Lesmana, A. S. (2019, Juli). Manipulasi Laporan Keuangan, Dirut Garuda Didesak Segera Dicopot. Diambil 28 Oktober 2019, dari https://www.suara.com/bisnis/2019/07/02/200807/manipulasi-laporan-keuangan-dirut-garuda-didesak-segera-dicopot

Marks, J. (2012). The Mind Behind The Fraudsters Crime: Key Behavioral and Environmental Elements Discussion Leader: Crowe Horwarth. Crowe Horwarth.

Nindito, M. (2018). Financial Statement Fraud: Perspective of The Pentagon Fraud Model in Indonesia. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, Volume 22(2), 1–9.

Pamungkas, I. D., & Utomo, St. D. (2018). Fraudulent Financial Reporting: An Application of Fraud Pentagon Theory to Association of Southeast Asian Nations Corporate Governance Scorecard. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, Vomune IX(5(35)), 1729–1737. https://doi.org/10.14505/jarle.v9.5(35).26

Rahman, A. A., & Nurbaiti, A. (2019). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan dalam Perspektif Fraud Pentagon (Studi pada Perusahaan Sektor Infrastruktur, Utilitas dan Transportasi yang Terdaftardi Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2016-2017). Journal Accounting and Finance, Vol. 3 No. 2, 34–44.

Setiawati, E., & Baningrum, R. M. (2018). Deteksi Fraudulent Financial Reporting Menggunakan Analisis Fraud Pentagon: Studi Kasus pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Listed di BEI Tahun 2014-2016. Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 91–106.

Siddiq, F. R., Achyani, F., & Zulfikar, Z. (2017). Fraud Pentagon Dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement. The 4th Call for Syariah Paper, 1–14.

Sihombing, K. S., & Rahardjo, S. N. (2014). Analisis Fraud Diamond dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement Fraudâ€: Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI). Journal of Accounting.

Skousen, C. (2008). Detecting and Predicting Financial Statemen Fraud: The Effectiveness of the Fraud Triangle and SAS No. 99. Journal of Accounting and Auditing, 13, 53–81.

Spatish, T. C. (2002). Detecting False Financial Statements Using Published Data: SomeEvidence from Greece. Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 17.

St. Pierre, K., & Anderson, J. A. (1984). An Analysis of The Factors Associated With Lawsuits Against Public Accountants. The Accounting Review, 242–263.

Stice, J. D. (1991). Using Financial and Market Information to Identify Preengagements Factors Associated with Lawsuits Against Auditors. The Accounting Review, 516–533.

Tessa, C., & Harto, P. (2016). Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Pengujian Teori Fraud Pentagon Pada Sektor Keuangan dan Perbankan di Indonesia. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIX.

Ulfah, M., Nuraina, E., & Wijaya, A. L. (2017). Pengaruh Farud Pentagon dalam Mendeteksi Farudulent Financial Reporting (Studi Empiris pada Perbankan di Indonesia yang Terdaftar di BEI). The 9th FIPA (Forum Ilmiah Pendidikan Akuntansi), Vol 5 No 1, 399–418.

Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond: Considering the Four Elements of Fraud. CPA Journal, 74.12, 38–42.

Yusof, M. K., A.H, A. K., & Simon, J. (2015). Fraudulent Listed Companies. he Macrotheme Review, 4(3).

Downloads

Published

05-07-2021

How to Cite

Fadhlurrahman, A. N. (2021). Deteksi Fraud Financial Statement Menggunakan Model Fraud Pentagon Pada Perusahaan Yang Terdaftar di JII Tahun 2016-2018. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 7(2), 1076–1083. https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v7i2.2566

Citation Check

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.