INVENTORY INTENSITY CAN MODERATE THE EFFECT OF CAPITAL INTENSITY ON TAX AGGRESSIVENESS

Authors

  • Andi Hidayatul Fadlilah
  • Marjono Marjono
  • Amy Septrina Tampubolon
  • Rebeka Meidiana
  • Siti Rahayu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29040/jie.v9i1.16375

Abstract

ABSTRACT

This research is a quantitative study with an explanatory approach, namely an approach that relies on a number of previous studies as the main milestones to build and strengthen arguments in the hypotheses that researchers present slowly. The data used in this article are secondary data that researchers obtained from the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2011 to 2021. The data obtained were analyzed using the smart PLS 4.0 analysis tool  that the Capital Intensity variable does have a positive relationship direction and a significant influence on Tax Aggressiveness. This is because the P-Value tends to be positive and is below the significance level of 0.05, namely 0.000.. In addition, in the next hypothesis, it is also true that the Inventory Intensity variable can strengthen the influence of the Capital Intensity variable on Tax Aggressiveness. This is because something similar if the P-Values are positive and below the significance level of 0.05, namely 0.000, is smaller than the direct test of 0.008

 Keywords: Inventory Intensity, Capital Intensity, Tax Aggressiveness 

References

REFERENCES

Abdurahman, Soejana. 2016. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Bougie, R. 2020. Research Methods For Business (A Skill Building Approach) 8th Edition. New Jersey.

Ghozali, I. 2016. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete Dengan Program (Ibm. Spss). Diponergoro: Univrsitas Dipenogoro.

Hartono, Rafif Ivan, And Harry Laksito. 2022. “Pengaruh Audit Tenure, Fee Audit, Ukuran Kantor Akuntan Publik, Spesialisasi Auditor, Komite Audit Terhadap Kualitas Audit.†Diponegoro Journal Of Accounting 11(1981): 1–12.

Jonathan Sarwono. 2016. Meode Penelitian Kualitatif Dan Kuantitatif. Bandung: Graha Ilmu.

Kumparan. 2023. “Apa Itu Indonesia Emas 2045? Ini Pengertian Dan Visinya.†Kumparan.Com: 18. Https://Kumparan.Com/Pengertian-Dan-Istilah/Apa-Itu-Indonesia-Emas-2045-Ini-Pengertian-Dan-Visinya-244vtvqiylg/Full.

Lanis, R. 2012. Corporate Social Responsibility And Tax Aggressiveness: An Empirical Analysis. Palembang: J. Account.

Mangoting, Yenni. 1999. “Tax Planning : Sebuah Pengantar Sebagai Alternatif Meminimalkan Pajak.†Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan 2(1): 43–53.

Mulyani, Darminto & Sri. 2018. “Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Turnover Intentions Dan Perilaku Kerja Kontraproduktif Karyawan Pada Perusahaan Ono Swalayan Sidareja.†Pembagian Harta Waris Dalam Adat Tionghoa Di Kecamatan Ilir Timur I Kota Palembang 1(14 June 2007): 1–13. Https://Core.Ac.Uk/Download/Pdf/11715904.Pdf.

Nasution, Y.S. 2019. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah “Pengaruh Ukuran Kantor Akuntan Publik, Audit Fee, Profitabilitas, Leverage, Ukuran Perusahaan Dan Capital Intensityterhadap Agresivitas Pajak.†Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.

Nurhalizah Arfa. 2022. “Pengaruh Capital Intansity, Inventory Intensity, Leverage, Profitabilitas, Dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Agresivitas Pajak (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Property And Real Estate Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2018-2021).†Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Ilmu Sosial Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau Pekanbaru.

Ogbeide, S.O. 2017. “Firm Characteristics And Tax Aggressiveness Of Listed Firms In Nigeria: Empirical Evidence.†International Journal Of Academic Research In Public Policy And Governance 4(1): 16.

Purwanto, A. 2016. “Pengaruh Likuiditas, Leverage, Manajemen Laba, Dan Kopensasi Rugi Fiskal Terhadap Agresivitas Pajak Perusahaan Pada Perusahaan Pertanian Dan Pertambangan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2011-2013.†Jom Fekon 3(1): 17.

Rahayu, Puji. 2017. “Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Laverage, Profitabilitas, Market To Book Ratio, Kepemiikan Mayoritas Dan Corporate Social Responsibility Terhadap Agresivitas Pajak.†Accounting Global Journal 1(1): 8.

Saputro, Rian. 2020. “Authentic Happiness As A Mediator Of Learning Organization.†Dijms 2(1): 112–24.

Sarstedt, Marko Et Al. 2014. “Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (Pls-Sem): A Useful Tool For Family Business Researchers.†Journal Of Family Business Strategy 5(1): 105–15.

Sewakottama, Muhammad Rastra. 2023. “Pengaruh Capital Intensity, Profitabilitas Dan Likuiditas Terhadap Agresivitas Pajak Pada Perusahaan Perbankan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2017 - 2021.†Universitas Tridinanti.

Sidabutar, Cindy, Suharyono, And Andriani Kusumawati. 2016. “Pengaruh Experiential Marketing Dan Emotional Marketing Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian (Survei Konsumen Sepatu Nike Di Indonesia Dan Di Malaysia) Cindy.†Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis 39(2): 92–99.

Sugiyono. 2019. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D.

Suharli, M. 2008. “Konsentrasi Auditor Dan Penetapan Fee Audit: Investigasi Pada Bumn.†Jaai Volume 12 No. 2 12(2): 18.

Supriyanto, Achmad Sani. 2013. “Role Of Procedural Justice, Organization Commitment And Job Satisfaction On Job Performance: The Mediating Effects Of Organizational Citizenship Behaviour.†Journal Of Business And Mangement 8(15): 57–67.

Suyadnya. 2020. “Pengaruh Ukuran Kantor Akuntan Publik, Audit Fee Dan Audit Tenure.†Jim: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah 4(2): 1.

Published

2025-01-14

How to Cite

Fadlilah, A. H., Marjono, M., Tampubolon, A. S., Meidiana, R., & Rahayu, S. (2025). INVENTORY INTENSITY CAN MODERATE THE EFFECT OF CAPITAL INTENSITY ON TAX AGGRESSIVENESS. JURNAL ILMIAH EDUNOMIKA, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.29040/jie.v9i1.16375

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check