DETERMINANTS OF ASSET MISAPPROPRIATION BY EMPLOYEE FROM NEW FRAUD TRIANGLE THEORY PERSPECTIVE (Case Study on Holding Company in Central Java)

Authors

  • Yunita Lisnaningtyas Utami Universitas Selamat Sri, Indonesia
  • Alfita Rakhmayani Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
  • Dwi Okto Imtichana Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
  • Neli Hajar Universitas Selamat Sri, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29040/ijebar.v5i2.2572

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the factors affecting assets misappropriation from new fraud triangle theory perspective. This new perspective has four components that trigger fraud, namely: pressure, opportunity, capability, and integrity. In this study pressure factor is separated between financial and non-financial. This study’s population was all holding company employee, totaling 350 employees. The sampling technique employed was purposive sampling. Respondents of this study are employee that member of a holding company in Central Java. Employees chosen as samples are employees who have the authority to carry out certain tasks or positions, and the number of samples is proportional to each company. The data were obtained by distributing questionnaires to 88 employees. The data analysis then utilized Wrap PLS analysis tool version 6.0 software. The results of this study indicate that financial pressures, opportunities, and capabilities influence assets misappropriation. Meanwhile, non-financial pressure and integrity do not affect the misappropriation of assets.

References

Abdullahi, R., & Mansor, N. (2017). Fraud prevention initiatives in the Nigerian public sector: understanding the relationship of fraud incidences and the elements of fraud triangle theory. Journal of Financial Crime, 55(2).

Albrecht, C., Kranacher, M., & Albrecht, S. (2011). Asset Misappropriation Research White Paper for the Institute for Fraud Prevention. 1–22.

Ambarwati, J., & Handayani, R. S. (2018). Analisis faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi kemungkinan terjadinya salah kelola aset tetap ditinjau dari perspektif fraud diamond theory (studi empiris pada perangkat daerah kabupaten semarang). 15(2), 165–203.

Bakri, H. H. M., Mohamed, N., & Jamaliah, S. (2017). Mitigating asset misappropriation through integrity and fraud risk elements. Journal of Financial Crime, 24(2), 242–255. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-04-2016-0024

Chen, J., Cumming, D., Hou, W., & Lee, E. (2013). Executive integrity, audit opinion, and fraud in Chinese listed firms. Emerging Markets Review, 15, 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2012.12.003

Dellaportas, S. (2013). Conversations with inmate accountants: Motivation, opportunity and the fraud triangle. Accounting Forum, 37(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2012.09.003

Diany, Y. A., & Ratmono, D. (2014). Determinan Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan: Pengujian Teori Fraud Triangle. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 6(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.32722/acc.v6i2.2481

Hooper, M. J., & Pornelli, C. M. (2010). Deterring and Detecting Financial Reporting Fraud; A platform for action (Issue October). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16461-3

Jensen, M. C. (2011). Putting Integrity Into Finance Theory and Practice : A Positive Approach ( pdf of Keynote slides ). 06, 2009–2011.

Kassem, R., & Higson, A. (2012). The New Fraud Triangle Model. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences, 3(3), 191–195.

Kazimean, S., Said, J., Nia, E. H., & Vakilifard, H. (2018). Examining Fraud Risk Factors on Asset Misappropriation : Evidence from the Iranian Banking Industry. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381.

Murdock, H. (2008). The three dimensions of fraud: Auditors should understand the needs, opportunities, and justifications that lead individuals to commit fraudulent acts. Internal Auditor, 4(65), 81.

Purnamasari, P., & Oktaroza, M. L. (2015). Influence of employee fraud on asset misappropriation analysed by fraud diamond dimension. August.

Rae, K., & Subramaniam, N. (2008). Quality of internal control procedures. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(2), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900810839820

Said, J., Alam, M., Karim, Z. A., & Johari, R. J. (2018). Integrating religiosity into fraud triangle theory : findings on Malaysian police officers. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRPP-09-2017-0027

Said, J., Alam, M. M., Ramli, M., & Rafidi, M. (2017). Integrating ethical values into fraud triangle theory in assessing employee fraud: Evidence from the Malaysian banking industry. Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 170–184. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2017/10-2/13

Tuanakotta, T. . (2010). Akuntansi Forensik dan Audit Investigasi. Salemba Empat.

Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond : Considering the Four Elements of Fraud. CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42. https://doi.org/DOI:

Downloads

Published

2021-06-17

How to Cite

Utami, Y. L., Rakhmayani, A., Imtichana, D. O., & Hajar, N. (2021). DETERMINANTS OF ASSET MISAPPROPRIATION BY EMPLOYEE FROM NEW FRAUD TRIANGLE THEORY PERSPECTIVE (Case Study on Holding Company in Central Java). International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 5(2). https://doi.org/10.29040/ijebar.v5i2.2572

Citation Check