THE EFFECT OF BURNOUT ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE WITH WORKLOAD AS A MODERATING VARIABLE
Abstract
This research is a quantitative study with an explanatory approach. The data used in this study use primary data that researchers obtained from 500 MDP Store employees spread throughout Indonesia obtained by means of an online questionnaire and sent via the respondents' WhatsApp accounts. The questionnaire contains 5 statements, namely strongly agree statements, agree statements, normal/so-so statements, disagree statements, and strongly disagree statements on the 10 questionnaires submitted. The data were analyzed using the smart PLS 4.0 analysis tool. The result in this article show that each hypothesis used in this article can be accepted and proven, namely that the Job Saturation variable can affect Employee Performance and the Workload variable can strengthen the influence of the Job Satisfaction variable on Employee Performance. Based on the results of the third table of the Path Coefficient above, it shows that the Burn Out variable can have an influence on Employee Performance, but it is negative because the T-Statistic value is above 1,960 but negative, namely -6,782 and the P-Values are below the significance level of 0.05, namely 0.036. From these results, it can be concluded that the more bored employees are at work, the more employee performance will decrease or erode.. In addition, in the next row, the Workload variable can strengthen the influence of Job Saturation on Employee Performance in a negative direction because the T-Statistic value is above 1.960, which is -10.232 and the P-Values are below the significance level of 0.05, which is 0.000. This means that the more Employee Workload can make employees more bored in working so that Employee Performance can decrease. Thus, the first and second hypotheses in this article can be accepted.
Keywords: Burnout, Employee Performance. Workload
Full Text:
PDFReferences
REFERENCES
Abdurahman, Soejana. 2016. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Afandi, P. 2018. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: Nusa Media.
Ainunnisa, Ditya Alfiena. 2022. “Pengaruh Green Human Resources Management Bagi Perilaku Karyawan Terhadap Kualitas Lingkungan Dan Kinerja Lingkungan Di Tingkat Universitas (Studi Kasus Pada Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).” Eprints Ums: 1–17. http://eprints.ums.ac.id/103178/.
Almaududi, Said. 2019. “Pengaruh Kejenuhan Kerja (Burnout) Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Bagian Operator Di PT PLN (Persero) Unit Pelaksana Pengendalian Pembangkit Jambi Unit Layanan Pusat Listrik Payo Selincah.” Ekonomis: Journal of Economics and Business 3(2): 193.
Dewi, Adriani Mustika Sari, and Suhardi. 2021. “Pengaruh Disiplin, Etika Kerja Dan Lingkungan Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pt Sentosa Prima Utama.” SCIENTIA JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa 3(2): 1–10. https://ejournal.upbatam.ac.id/index.php/scientia_journal/article/view/2855.
Febrisa Yosanti, K. 2020. Pengaruh BurnoutTerhadap Kinerja Karyawan Hotel. Bandung: Crowne Plaza Bandung Jurnal Kajian Pariwisata Dan Bisnis Perhotelan.
Ghozali, I. 2016. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete Dengan Program (IBM. SPSS). Diponergoro: Univrsitas Dipenogoro.
Hair. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis, Seventh Editions. Prentice Hall: New Jersey.
Huda, Miftakhul, and Fikri Farhan. 2019. “Pengaruh Budaya Organisasional Dan Komitmen Organisasional.” Jurnal Manajemen Motivasi 15(2): 62.
Ichsan, Mohammad, Agung Sudjatmoko, Shifa Aprilianti, and Amanda Putri Nurshavira. 2022. “Analisis Pengaruh Work Stress and Burnout Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Di DKI Jakarta Selama Pandemi COVID-19.” Jurnal Ecogen 5(3): 353.
Jannah, M. 2021. Repository.Uinjkt.Ac.Id “Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja Dan Burnout Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PT. Vinilon Building.” UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA. http://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/55383.
Jonathan Sarwono. 2016. Meode Penelitian Kualitatif Dan Kuantitatif. Bandung: Graha Ilmu.
Juniarti, Atty Tri, Bayu Indra Setia, and Helmi Nofrizal Fahmi. 2021. Lingkungan Organisasi Dan Etos Kerja Dalam MSDM.
King, L. 2010. Psikologi Umum. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
Lestari, Endah Rahayu, and Nur Kholifatul Fithriyah Ghaby. 2018. “The Influence of Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) on Employee’s Job Satisfaction and Performance.” Industria: Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen Agroindustri 7(2): 116–23.
Mangkunegara, A.A.A.P. 2012. Perilaku Konsumen. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama Bandung.
Mangkunegara, Anwar Prabu. 2013. Evaluasi Kinerja SDM. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Maslach, L. 2016. “Understanding the Burnout Experience: Recent Research and Its Implications for Psychiatry.” World Psychiatry 15(1): 103–11.
Putri, Dona Dwiyanti. 2018. 3 No. 1 Manajemen “Pengaruh Kepuasan Kerja Dan Burnout Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Produksi Pt. Lea Sanent.” UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA. http://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/46404.
Putri Rizki Amelia. 2023. “Pengaruh Self Efficacy Dan Burnout Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Dengan Kepuasan Kerja Sebagai Variabel Intervening (Studi Kasus Pada Tamarin Hotel Jakarta).” UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI SYARIF HIDYATULLAH JAKARTA.
Rita. 2020. Skripsi “PENGARUH BUDAYA ORGANISASI DAN DISIPLIN KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN PADA PT. PRIMA JAYA.” UNIVERSITAS BUDDHI DHARMA TANGERANG. http://repositori.buddhidharma.ac.id/607/.
Sarstedt, Marko et al. 2014. “Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM): A Useful Tool for Family Business Researchers.” Journal of Family Business Strategy 5(1): 105–15.
Sugiyono. 2019. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D.
Winda Meidina, Dwi, and dan S Netty Laura. 2022. “The Effect of Employees’ Mental Health on Performance Mediated by Welfare in the Workplace (Empirical Study on Information Technology Division Employees During Work From Home.” Business Management Journal 18(1): 85–105. https://journal.ubm.ac.id/index.php/business-management/.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29040/jie.v8i3.14896
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
||