Beyond the halal–haram dichotomy: A gharar-based shariah screening framework for crypto-assets in Islamic digital finance

Authors

  • Muhammad Ahsanul Amal Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Mukhamad Yazid Afandi Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Imran State Islamic University of Kendari, Indonesia
  • Arta Amaliah Nur Afifah Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Dewi Inayatul Sakinah State Islamic University of Kendari, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v12i5.20831

Keywords:

Crypto-assets, Fiqh muamalah, Gharar, Islamic digital finance, Shariah screening

Abstract

Crypto-assets create new opportunities for Islamic digital finance, yet they also raise unresolved Shariah concerns related to uncertainty, ownership, delivery, disclosure, legal enforceability, custody, and speculation. This study develops a gharar-based Shariah screening framework for evaluating crypto-assets beyond the conventional halal–haram dichotomy. Using a conceptual narrative literature review, this study synthesizes Scopus-indexed literature on cryptocurrency, crypto-assets, gharar, excessive uncertainty, Shariah screening, Islamic finance, and Islamic digital finance, supported by selected regulatory and fatwa documents. The review finds that gharar in crypto-asset transactions is multidimensional, emerging from unclear asset backing, weak utility, ambiguous ownership rights, uncertain qabd and deliverability, limited disclosure, legal uncertainty, custody risk, price volatility, and speculative intensity. To address this issue, the study distinguishes ordinary commercial risk, gharar yasir, and gharar fahish as three levels of uncertainty in Islamic commercial transactions. The proposed framework translates these findings into a category-based Shariah screening matrix built around eight dimensions: asset backing, utility, ownership clarity, qabd and deliverability, disclosure, legal certainty, custody security, and speculative intensity. This matrix allows stablecoins, asset-backed tokens, security tokens, decentralized finance assets, and meme coins to be assessed according to their specific uncertainty profiles rather than treated as one homogeneous category. The study contributes to fiqh muamalah and Islamic digital finance by repositioning gharar from a prohibitive legal label into an evaluative framework. The framework may support Shariah boards, regulators, Islamic fintech platforms, and Muslim investors in conducting pre-listing review, risk disclosure, and category-based crypto-asset assessment.

References

Ahmed, H. (2024). Security tokens, ecosystems and financial inclusion: Islamic perspectives. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 17(4), 730–745. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-04-2024-0195

Ahmed, W. M. A. (2021). How do Islamic equity markets respond to good and bad volatility of cryptocurrencies? The case of Bitcoin. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 70, 101667. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101667

Alsadhan, A. A. (2025). Analyzing Cryptocurrency Security Risks: A Comprehensive Survey of Saudi Arabian Perspectives. IET Information Security, 2025(1), 5100339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1049/ise2/5100339

Arif, M., Naeem, M. A., Hasan, M., M Alawi, S., & Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2022). Pandemic crisis versus global financial crisis: Are Islamic stocks a safe-haven for G7 markets? Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 1707–1733. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.1910532

Arnone, G. (2024). Cryptocurrencies in investment and financial markets. In Navigating the World of Cryptocurrencies: Technology, Economics, Regulations, and Future Trends (pp. 79–90). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69176-8_8

Asl, M. G., & Roubaud, D. (2024). Asymmetric interactions among cutting-edge technologies and pioneering conventional and Islamic cryptocurrencies: Fresh evidence from intra-day-based good and bad volatilities. Financial Innovation, 10(89), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-024-00623-5

Ayedh, A., Echchabi, A., Battour, M., & Omar, M. (2020). Malaysian Muslim investors’ behaviour towards the blockchain-based Bitcoin cryptocurrency market. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 12(4), 690–704. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-04-2019-0081

Baethge, C., Goldbeck-Wood, S., & Mertens, S. (2019). SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 4, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8

Bekiroğlu, A. M., El Amri, M. C., & Mohammed, M. O. (2025). Empirical validation of a framework for Fiqh analysis of crypto assets. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-03-2025-0075

Bin-nashwan, S. A., Muneeza, A., Ismaiel, A. E. A., Mohamed, I., Bajary, A. R., & Obaid, M. M. (2024). Will Muslims integrate an Islamic accounting principle (zakat) into the fi nancial paradigm reshaped by cryptocurrencies ? Insights into cryptocurrencies holder perspectives. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-04-2024-0201

Choi, S.-Y., Phiri, A., Teplova, T., & Umar, Z. (2024). Connectedness between (un)conventional monetary policy and islamic and advanced equity markets: A returns and volatility spillover analysis. International Review of Economics & Finance, 91, 348–363. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.01.034

Chong, F. H. L. (2021). Enhancing trust through digital Islamic finance and blockchain technology. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 13(3), 328–341. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-05-2020-0076

ESMA, E. S. and M. A. (2025). Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA). European Securities and Markets Authority. https://www.esma.europa.eu/esmas-activities/digital-finance-and-innovation/markets-crypto-assets-regulation-mica

Foo, S. M., Ab Razak, N. H., Kamarudin, F., Azizan, N. A. B., & Zakaria, N. (2025). Islamic versus conventional financial market: a meta-literature review of spillover effects. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 16(4), 760–790. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-09-2022-0233

Gundogdu, A. S. (2020). Exploring novel Islamic monetary system. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 11(2), 440–456. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-12-2017-0180

IOSCO, I. O. of S. C. (2023). Policy recommendations for crypto and digital asset markets: Final report. International Organization of Securities Commissions. https://www.iosco.org/library/pubdocs/pdf/IOSCOPD747.pdf

Izadin, A. A. I., Mohd. Yusof, R., & Mazlan, A. R. (2025). The integration of Maqasid Shariah in evaluating stablecoins and traditional cryptocurrencies for Islamic portfolios diversification. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 18(3), 577–597. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-08-2024-0380

Jailani, M. A., & Muneeza, A. (2023). Crypto assets: The need for Shariah screening criteria for digital assets in Malaysia. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Research, 1, 27–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53840/ijiefer111

Kok, S. K., Akwei, C., Giorgioni, G., & Farquhar, S. (2022). On the regulation of the intersection between religion and the provision of financial services: Conversations with market actors within the global Islamic financial services sector. Research in International Business and Finance, 59, 101552. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101552

Maghyereh, A. I., Abdoh, H., & Awartani, B. (2019). Connectedness and hedging between gold and Islamic securities: A new evidence from time-frequency domain approaches. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 54, 13–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.01.008

Mnif, E., Daoud, Y., Zied, A., & Jarboui, A. (2024). Islamic cryptocurrency integration for enhanced sustainable finance: evidence from time-frequency volatility transmission investigation. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 22(4), 435–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/14765284.2024.2388492

MUI, M. U. I. (2022). Hukum cryptocurrency. Majelis Ulama Indonesia. https://fatwamui.com/storage/540/HUKUM-CRYPTOCURRENCY.pdf

Muneeza, A., Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Abdel Moshin, M. I., Mohamed, I., & Al-Saadi, A. (2022). Zakat payment from cryptocurrencies and crypto assets. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 16(3), 482–497. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-12-2021-0487

Muryanto, Y. T. (2023). The urgency of sharia compliance regulations for Islamic Fintechs: a comparative study of Indonesia, Malaysia and the United Kingdom. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(5), 1264–1278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-05-2022-0099

Muryanto, Y. T., Kharisma, D. B., & Ciptorukmi Nugraheni, A. S. (2021). Prospects and challenges of Islamic fintech in Indonesia: a legal viewpoint. International Journal of Law and Management, 64(2), 239–252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-07-2021-0162

Naim, N., & Kasri, N. S. (2025). Intellectual Property and Islamic Finance: Opportunities and Challenges for a New Islamic Intellectual Property Finance Framework. Thunderbird International Business Review, 67(3), 395–412. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22430

OJK, O. J. K. (2024). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 27 Tahun 2024 tentang Penyelenggaraan Perdagangan Aset Keuangan Digital Termasuk Aset Kripto. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. https://ojk.go.id/id/regulasi/Documents/Pages/POJK-27-2024-AKD-AK/POJK 27 Tahun 2024 Penyelenggaraan Perdagangan Aset Keuangan Digital Termasuk Aset Kripto AKD AK.pdf

Patel, R., Migliavacca, M., & Oriani, M. E. (2022). Blockchain in banking and finance: A bibliometric review. Research in International Business and Finance, 62, 101718. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101718

Rahim, N. F., Bakri, M. H., Fianto, B. A., Zainal, N., & Hussein Al Shami, S. A. (2022). Measurement and structural modelling on factors of Islamic Fintech adoption among millennials in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 14(6), 1463–1487. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-09-2020-0279

Rusmita, S. A., Filianti, D., Mayasani, E. N., & Samad, K. A. (2026). Gold characteristics as safe haven and assets diversification for Sharia stocks in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 17(5), 925–940. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-11-2021-0302

Sheikh, U. A., Tabash, M. I., Roubaud, D., Galariotis, E., & Guesmi, K. (2026). Asymmetric Good and Bad Volatility Transmission Mechanism: Moderating Role of Global Uncertainties. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 31(1), 584–619. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.3158

Sifat, I. M., & Mohamad, A. (2018). Revisiting Fiat Regime’s Attainability of Shari’ah Objectives and Possible Futuristic Alternatives. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 38(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2018.1435057

Trichilli, Y., Rabbani, M. R., Bouri, E., & Boujelbène, M. (2026). Hedging Islamic assets with the blockchain halal index: A regime-switching model. Review of Financial Economics, 44(1), e70021. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/rfe.70021

Wiwoho, J., Trinugroho, I., Kharisma, D. B., & Suwadi, P. (2024). Islamic crypto assets and regulatory framework : evidence from Indonesia and global approaches. International Journal of Law and Management, 66(2), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-03-2023-0051

Younis, I., Du, A. M., Gupta, H., & Shah, W. U. (2024). Dynamic spillover effects and interconnectedness of DeFi assets, commodities, and Islamic stock markets during crises. International Review of Financial Analysis, 96, 103563. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103563

Zaman, A., Tlemsani, I., Matthews, R., & Mohamed Hashim, M. A. (2023). Assessing the potential of blockchain technology for Islamic crypto assets. Competitiveness Review, 35(2), 229–250. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-05-2023-0100

Downloads

Published

30-10-2026

How to Cite

Amal, M. A., Afandi, M. Y., Imran, M., Afifah, A. A. N., & Sakinah, D. I. (2026). Beyond the halal–haram dichotomy: A gharar-based shariah screening framework for crypto-assets in Islamic digital finance. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 12(5), 404–415. https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v12i5.20831

Citation Check

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.